KIRSTEN FURLONG explores the interplay between culture and nature and the multifaceted relationships between humans and animals in her drawings, prints and fiber-based installations. In her project Unchopping a Tree, based on the eponymous W.S. Merwin prose poem, she laments the lost lives of trees and the impossibility of reviving what has already died. Kirsten earned her BFA (1995) from the University of Nebraska in Omaha and her MFA (2000) from Boise State University in Idaho. Recent solo exhibitions include Kirsten Furlong: Repeat and Shift (2014) at Enso Arts in Boise, Idaho and Standing Still and Moving Through The Wilderness at Coconino Center for the Arts in Flagstaff, Arizona. Her work is included in Dog Head Stew | The Second Course, which just opened this week on October 19, 2015 at Gallery 239, Chadron State College in Nebraska. Another group show, Paper West, opens on November 5, 2015 at Gittins Gallery in Salt Lake City, Utah. In September 2015, she was the Artist-in-Residence at Crooked Tree Art Center in Traverse City, Michigan. She is the Gallery Director and Curator for the Visual Arts Center and a Lecturer at Boise State University. Kirsten lives in Boise, Idaho.
OtherPeoplesPixels: In your artist statement,
you say, "animals serve as emblems of nature and as metaphors for human
desires." It seems to me that human desires aren't that different from
animal desires. What does it mean for our relationship to animals that
we turn them into metaphors for our own experiences rather than
imagining their experiences?
Kirsten Furlong: Animals,
in many cases, carry the weight of our cultural baggage which can make
it very unclear what anyone’s actual desires may be, animal or human.
The most basic and necessary human desires may be for water and air, and
yet we engage in activities that foul these resources and deny both
humans and animals access to them.
However, a species becoming
emblematic has occasionally been useful if they get our attention due to
a larger narrative or problem. For example, the near destruction of bald eagles from DDT
and the subsequent ban and recovery. There is such an incredible
complexity of animal identities, politics and cultural identities tied
to the land and species that reside therein. This dynamic takes on
particular qualities here in the Western U.S. Thoughtful consideration
of the experiences of animals such as wolves, sage grouse, or the giant Palouse earthworm would certainly steer our treatment of their lives in a different directions than they seem to be currently heading.
OPP: Could you tell us about your experimental garments for animals? Why do these birds need hats?
KF:
The “garments” started as three-dimensional studio sketches created
from hand-made and hand-stitched wool felt. The initial forms were
created as protective outer-wear with architectural qualities designed
for a few particular birds, insects and small mammals. These forms were
intended for a project in which they would be placed in environments to
be discovered by these species. The subsequent interactions,
collaborations—or lack there of—would generate ideas for the future
completed designs. While impatiently awaiting these collaborations and
sometimes storing the forms on the head of a taxidermied chuckar
partridge in my studio, their unintended, uncanny resemblance to various
hats or historic head gear became apparent: dunce caps, papal mitre,
bonnets, chaperons, hoods, and military gear. So, while there is no need
on the bird's part for a hat, providing one points out, in an ironic
way, the uniquely human need for adornments and accoutrements.
OPP: How does your use of repetitive mark-making—in the forms of drawing, cutting and sewing—in pieces like Standing Still - Tree Circle (2012), Twice: Migration (2009) and Wolf Mouth (2013) support the content of your work?
KF:
My process is to mimic forms and patterns made by plants and animals:
tree rings, concentric lines on seashells, woven grass in a bird nest,
fractal patterns on ferns and corals, spider webs, or the meandering
line of a snake. This is a way of understanding natural processes via
imitation and representation using the tools of the artist —the pen, the
blade, the needle.
OPP: I like imagining Nature
making marks in the same way an artist does, as if it is cognizant and
self aware. Perhaps we should go back to the tradition of
anthropomorphizing Nature itself, as used to occur in ancient myths . . .
might we treat it better if we thought of Nature as a creative being
deserving empathy?
KF: This is not just a belief of the
past but a way of thinking that is embraced in a number of cultures, and
it can have a profound impact on how one exists as a part of Nature.
Many dismiss systems of thought like anthropomorphism and animism
or consider them only as cultural constructs, but I think a more nuanced
approach that crosses the boundaries of natural sciences and
arts/humanities is where the most interesting discussions are taking
place.
OPP: You just returned from a residency at Crooked Tree Arts Center in Northern Michigan. What drew you to this residency and what did you work on while you were there?
KF:
I have never visited the area, and I like to invigorate my studio
practice by situating it now and then in unfamiliar places. Also, I had
the opportunity to teach a workshop called Image Layering with Printmaking, Painting and Drawing. I introduced a variety of techniques for mark making including frottage, chine colle' and image transfers. For the frottage
process, I demonstrated how to use found textures of wood grain, stones
and plants with printmaking inks and graphite on thin papers. Then I showed
the process of cutting and adhering these images /patterns to thicker
papers and adding additional images with transfers /drawing/painting.
This temporary move from the late summer high desert to the leafy landscape of Northern Michigan's forest preserves and great lakes provided much to investigate. The most fascinating discoveries on the shore of Lake Michigan were the unique geological features - the fossil patterns of Petoskey stones and chain coral influenced some of the drawings I worked on during the stay. The Crooked Tree program is unique in that the artist stays in a private studio and apartment adjacent to the residency hosts' home. The hosts are very knowledgeable about the area and the local flora and fauna and shared a lot of useful information about the region. I also created some site specific works related to my Unchopping a Tree series in a grove of poplars a short walking distance from the studio. I had the opportunity to visit Headlands, one of few designated International Dark Sky Parks, which has me thinking a lot about darkness and nocturnal environments as threatened natural resources.
OPP: Do you see Unchopping a Tree (2013) as part of the trajectory of the earthworks of the 1970s?
KF: It's interesting to consider. Unchopping a Tree was inspired by a W.S. Merwin prose poem of the same name
that was originally published in 1970. It’s publication and the
earthworks are contemporaneous with the 1970s environmental movement and
federal legislation for water, air and wilderness. They also coincide
with my youth. Although I lived in cities and had no connection to
wilderness or National Parks, I was still influenced by the cultural
milieu of Woodsy the Owl, Smokey the Bear and collected what I could find from my backyard for “nature crafts.”
As
an adult, I have visited many of the major earthwork sites of the West.
If we can consider the trajectory and its many branches to include the
influence of artists like Joseph Beuys and Richard Long,
than perhaps what I’m doing is an offshoot from that. The major
difference is the scale. Monumental alterations of the landscape like Double Negative, Spiral Jetty and Roden Crater
are gigantic gestures. I tend to focus on smaller, and in some cases,
nearly invisible patterns and processes. I concentrate on the details,
which is what really struck me about the Merwin work. This written work
essentially instructs the reader how to put back together a tree that
has been cut down and all of the directives are, of course, impossible.
The passages about sawdust and spider webs and nests are what really got
me thinking about intricacy and what one likely wouldn’t see at all.
That is the larger metaphor that moves me. When it come to the
environment, we’ve gone so far down the path of destruction and removal,
it seems unlikely that the damage can be undone or even sufficiently
repaired.
Featured Artist Interviews are conducted by Chicago-based, interdisciplinary artist Stacia Yeapanis. When she’s not writing for OPP, Stacia explores the relationship between repetition, desire and impermanence in cross-stitch embroideries, remix video, collage and impermanent installations. She is an instructor in the Department of Fiber and Material Studies at The School of the Art Institute of Chicago, where received her MFA in 2006, and was a 2012-2013 Mentor-in-Residence at BOLT in Chicago. Her solo exhibitions include I Still Haven’t Found What I’m Looking For (2013) at Klemm Gallery, Siena Heights University (Adrian, Michigan), Everything You Need is Already Here (2014) at Heaven Gallery (Chicago) and When Things Fall Apart, a durational, collage installation in the Annex Gallery at Lillstreet Art Center (Chicago). Stacia recently completed an installation for Chicago Artists' Coalition's 2015 Starving Artist Benefit and is currently working towards a two-person show, also featuring the work of Aimée Beaubien, for O’Connor Art Gallery at Dominican University (River Forest, IL). The show will open on November 5, 2015.