Acrylic on Panel
37"x 45" ADAM FRIEDMAN is aware of the tropes of sublime nature. His
chosen subject matter—mountains, sunsets, oceans and outer space—have
all accumulated symbolic meanings through the lenses of science,
literature, pop culture and art history. He merges these meanings in
two-dimensional and three-dimensional paintings that bend the rules of
perspective, space and time, representing the mysteries of nature rather
than a realistic rendering of it. Adam received his MFA from the San
Francisco Art Institute in 2008. He is represented by Eleanor Harwood Gallery in San Francisco, where he mounted his solo exhibition Space and Time, and Other Mysterious Aggregations in 2013. His upcoming solo exhibition Esoterica opens on March 7, 2014 at One Grand Gallery in Portland, Oregon, where Adam lives.
OtherPeoplesPixels: Mountains and glaciers are recurrent visual motifs in your work. What is so compelling about these landforms for you?
I’m originally from a small town in North Lake Tahoe. I literally grew
up surrounded by some of the most epic mountains in the continental U.S.
(if not the world!). My family eventually moved down to Encinitas in
North County, near San Diego, where I became obsessed with the ocean. . .
I was surfing, swimming, fishing almost every day. I have a deep-seated
love for the great outdoors. For me, a snow capped mountain or a stormy
ocean is the ultimate symbol of sublimity. Aside from my own personal
investment in these motifs, there are art historical references. From
the Hudson River School to Ed Ruscha and beyond, a large mountain has
and always will be a powerful trope, simultaneously beautiful and
The Spiral of Time, The Black Whole of Space
Acylic, Screen Print, Gel Transfers, and Collage on Panel
OPP: An Impossible Ascendancy (2013), Never Still-Life (2013) and A False Assignment of Ownership
(2012) are paintings of landscape sculptures sitting on familiar white
pedestals. In each one, mountains or glaciers are breaking through the
top of the glass case that is meant to contain or preserve them. Could
you talk about the attempt to contain nature in art (or in general)?
The vitrines/pedestals are recognizable as objects that we see in
museums and galleries. These structures typically house articles of
particular human accomplishment in art, science, history, etc. Through
the lens of science, they represent understanding, as in a natural
history museum. But there is a fine line between “understanding” and
“ownership.” We name things, places, people and cultures so that we can
begin to comprehend them. But in doing so—especially in the case of the
natural world and the cosmos—we deny their overwhelming mystery. Painters,
photographers and writers have tried for centuries to create
representations of the awe-inspiring experience of nature. As powerful
as they may be, they never adequately represent the real thing. The
landscape sculptures breaking out of glass are my way of recognizing
that human beings can never fully grasp, nor control nature. These
pieces are about relishing in the mystery of it all.
Bedrock of Being
Acrylic on 2 Panels
36"x 46" (each panel)
Your newest paintings remind me of album covers for classic rock bands
like Pink Floyd and Led Zeppelin. Is album art an influence for you?
That’s awesome, and it’s something that I’ve heard a few times. I think
that I’m more influenced by the music than the album covers. The album
art is a sort of representation of the music, so it makes sense that I
share a similar aesthetic. I love psych rock from the late sixties and
seventies: Blue Cheer, Hawkwind, UFO, Zior, Ashkan, Tangerine Dream,
Cactus, Captain Beyond. "Larks Tongues in Aspic" by King Crimson
is one of my favorite albums of all time and has been highly
influential for me over the years. Music is a HUGE part of my process. I
typically spend 8 to 12 hours a day in the studio, listening to music
the entire time, so it makes a lot of sense.
Spacial Aggregation (front)
Acrylic on Wood
57"x 68"x 28"
OPP: Could you talk about the integration of time into your paintings of space? I'm thinking of pieces like Oceans Before and Behind Us in Time (2010) and Bedrock and Paradox (2013).
Time is present in a variety of ways. First off, my paintings take a
long time to complete. I have friends that can finish work really
quickly, and I’ve always been a bit envious of them. But I’ve learned to
embrace my process and not try to force or rush things along. But more
importantly, Time is conceptually interesting. For a human being, 100
years is a long time. . . But I paint landscapes. Geologically speaking,
100 million years isn’t very long. So our understanding of time is
completely skewed as it relates to the cosmos and the bigger picture. We
also understand time through the lens of space. For instance, if I
stand on top of a mountain looking off towards the ocean, I understand
that the ocean is far away based on how long I imagine it would take to
get there. But time and space exist independently of one another, and
the universe exists without all the binaries we use to understand it
(time and space, up and down, in and out). So I like to make paintings
that break the rules of those imposed binaries. Space and Time,
for example, displays multiple locations folded on top of one another.
Vanishing points don't follow typical rules of perspective, and objects
in the foreground appear the be far off in the distance.
That Which Swells
Acrylic, Screen Print, Gel Transfers, and Collage on Panel
Before 2010, your works were collages on panel which involved acrylic,
screen print and gel transfers. Now, you are working primarily in
acrylic. What precipitated the change in media? How did the collage work
lead to the new paintings?
AF: I started painting when
I was really young, but became focused on printmaking in college. I had
almost stopped painting entirely until I entered grad school. I began
cutting up my prints and collaging them onto wood panels, basically
making “paintings” again. Screen printing is inherently pretty flat, so I
began reincorporating paint. Acrylic made sense for mixed media works.
Slowly my love for the paint—feel, color, directness, process—took over,
and I started using the printed media less and less. I barely use it at
all anymore, but my years of printmaking have definitely influenced the
way I paint. I’m very detail and process oriented. I apply paint in
non-traditional ways. For instance, I often paint onto polyethylene
plastic, peel it up and apply it to my panels with gel medium. It then
gets painted over again. In this sense, it is a collage-like process,
but I’m using all acrylic medium.
Recently, I’ve been moving
towards three-dimensional work. I still consider them paintings, but
they are also sculptural in nature. Sculpture has been a huge influence
on my work lately through painting all of the pedestal imagery. I’m
working towards a solo show that opens on March 7, 2014 at One Grand Gallery here in Portland. There will be a lot of three-dimensional paintings, as well as actual pedestals with objects under glass.
To view more of Adam's work, please visit artbyadamfriedman.com
.Featured Artist Interviews are conducted by Chicago-based interdisciplinary artist Stacia Yeapanis.
When she’s not writing for OPP, Stacia explores the relationship between repetition, desire and impermanence in her
cross-stitch embroideries, remix video and collage installations. She is
an instructor in the Department of Fiber and Material Studies at The
School of the Art Institute of Chicago, where received her MFA in 2006,
and was a 2012-2013
Mentor-in-Residence at BOLT in Chicago. Her solo exhibition I Still Haven’t Found What I’m Looking For at Klemm Gallery, Siena Heights University (Adrian,
Michigan) recently closed, and her solo exhibition Everything You Need is Already Here is on view at Heaven Gallery in Chicago until February 17, 2014