PRISCILLA
BRIGGS investigates representations of capitalism, consumerism and the
global market in her photographs of malls, tourist markets and
manufacturing districts throughout the world. She emphasizes the role of
advertising imagery as an influential backdrop in the creation and
reflection of personal and collective cultural identities. Priscilla’s
photographs were most recently seen in the group exhibition Art in the Age of Globalization at the Minneapolis Institute of Art, and she has had solo exhibitions at The Phipps Center for the Arts (2010), the Milwaukee Institute of Art and Design, (2009) and Minnesota Center for Photography (2008). Her work is included in the rotating Midwest Photographer's Project at the Museum of Contemporary Photography and the permanent collections of the Cleveland Institute of Art and the Hillstrom Museum. Priscilla is currently at artist-in-residence at the Chinese European Art Center in Xiamen, China, but her home base is Saint Paul, Minnesota.
OtherPeoplesPixels:
You've spent a lot of time photographing malls and other market spaces
throughout the world. I'm curious about your personal experience being
in spaces that revolve around consumerism. Can you tell us about an
early shopping memory?
Priscilla Briggs: I grew up by the
seashore in Maryland where I spent a lot of time on the boardwalk—a
carnivalesque tourist haven. There were a few shops that I visited over
and over. My absolute favorite store sold a menagerie of horribly
kitschy blown-glass tchotchkes, such as a pair of translucent pink swans
made doubly fabulous by a spray of optic fibers. I spent many magical
hours in that store, but I never actually bought anything. I wasn’t
interested in owning a single glass figurine. It was more the experience
of being surrounded by a room full of beautifully reflective and
colorful glass objects that I enjoyed. In retrospect, I equate that experience to my adult enjoyment of art installations by artists like James Turrell or Sarah Sze.
(Gift Shop, Bangkok, Thailand)
OPP: What's your personal experience with malls?
PB:
Malls are akin to museums. They are designed spaces full of objects for
sale that are really artifacts of our culture, reflecting what we
value, what we find desirable, how we live. The accompanying advertising
inserts these objects into our lives, and embeds them within mythological narratives that most of us can’t help but internalize in some way. These affect and reflect our sense of individual identities and our collective identity as a culture.
Most malls feel like safe, contained spaces. They are primarily
occupied by chain stores that you can find nationally, if not all over
the world. Many people like the reliability of that kind of consistency;
they find it comforting and efficient. My work is fairly critical of
these spaces and the unbridled
consumerism they are designed to encourage. Although I do shop at malls
occasionally, I try to frequent and support stand-alone locally based
businesses that are less corporate as much as I can. I rarely went to
malls
before I started photographing them and now, after spending so much time
there for work, I have no desire to linger.
OPP: What drew you to malls as sites to photograph?
PB: My work has evolved from a foundation in environmental portraiture, with a shift in focus from the unique individual to consumer culture identity. Because the market drives a capitalist society, I was drawn to that as a subject, initially looking at how advertising narratives influence one's personal sense of identity. When I moved to Minnesota 10 years ago, I couldn’t resist the call of the Mall of America, such an obvious icon of capitalist consumerism. Then I read an article about a mall craze in China: over 500 malls were built in a five-year period, some five to seven times the size of the Mall of America. I was intrigued by what this would look like in a country with a history of communism, and that’s how my work segued to China.
OPP: Your 2010 series The Road to Shantou
juxtaposes interiors and exteriors from "a manufacturing district in
Shantou where most of the brassieres in the world are made within the 50
square mile area between Chendian Town, Chaonan and Gurao Town." The
fact that all the billboards feature white women and all the garment
workers are Chinese makes the discrepancy between worker and customer so
evident. You mention the Chinese history of valuing female modesty in
your statement. In photographing in the factories, did you get any sense
of how the people there experienced the advertising that surrounds them
in their daily lives? What did you learn that isn't in the photographs?
PB: The Chinese are very matter-of-fact people. I
think they take the advertising at face value and probably tune it out.
What’s striking about this area is not so much that the billboards show
scantily-clad women—this has recently become common in cities all over
China—but that the sheer amount of this imagery makes walking through
the streets like living in a Victoria’s Secret catalog. One thing
that is perhaps not evident in the photographs is that the
advertisements are directed at the Chinese distributor rather than the
end-customer. Most foreign wholesalers will place their orders at big
wholesale export fairs like the Canton Market in Guangzhou, so there are
very few foreigners who come to this area. The use of primarily
Caucasian and Arabic models is partly due to the belief by many Chinese
that these women are sexier and more curvaceous than Chinese women. In
the same way that many American women wish they were as skinny as the
models in magazines, many Chinese women often wish they were curvier like the Western models in their advertising.
OPP: Global Market
pairs images from the Mall of America in Minnesota with images taken in
various outdoor markets and shopping centers in Cuba and Thailand. Talk
about the overlap of consumerism and tourism in this body of work and
your use of postcards in the 2008 installation at Minnesota Center for Photography.
PB: I first used the postcards in the Market
exhibit, which was comprised of photos from the Mall of America
only. The postcards referenced the MoA as a tourist destination—people
actually fly from other parts of the country to spend a week at the Mall
of America. I included text on the back of the postcards,
providing statistics about American consumer habits, and used titles to
connect the image and text conceptually. The postcards made the exhibit
more interactive. Visitors could take a postcard right off the shelf and purchase it.
Global Market
expanded on the idea of the tourist market and included images from
Thailand and Cuba because I had the opportunity to travel to those
countries through my job as a professor.
Tourist markets are
fascinating in that the souvenirs sold there are often objects that are
designed to represent the culture being visited, specifically in a way
that distinguishes it from other cultures. I have often found these
representations to be more a reflection of what the tourist hopes to
find rather than what exists in reality—the toured have a stake in
maintaining that façade in order to keep the tourists coming and
spending. Gary Larson summed up this kind of performing of culture very
well in his Far Side cartoon
of Polynesians scrambling to hide their TV, VCR and lamp as a
Caucasian man in a safari outfit walks toward their hut, with the
caption “Anthropologists! Anthropologists!”
For example, Copy
an image of a Long-Neck Karen woman holding up a postcard with a
picture of herself on it, was shot in a refugee village in Thailand.
After tour companies started dropping off busloads of tourists in their
village everyday, the villagers started charging admission to the
village, gave up their farming practices and each opened a stall in
front of their house to sell souvenirs. They also started wearing
traditional dress everyday rather than just on special occasions. When I
invited a representative from the Thai tourist commission to speak with
our students, he referred to the villagers as “the product.” Two of the
postcard images in the show were of Hill Tribe children on the side of
the road with a sign that says “Take the Photo 20 Baht.” I included
information on how to practice community-based tourism in Thailand and
ways to help the Hill Tribe Villagers on the back of the postcards and
titled them Take the Photo I & II. All the other postcards could be purchased for a dollar, but these two were free.
OPP: Wushipu
(2010) investigates the workspaces of Chinese production painters
through portraiture and still life photography. This body of work is
very connected to your other work in that it investigates a market where
the East and the West collide, where Chinese workers are satisfying
Western demands for luxury goods. But it also brings up the issue of
value as it pertains to painting and photography, copying and
originality, art and craft. What's your take on the labor these painters
do? Are they artists? Is the labor the same as what the garment workers
do?
PB: Your question sums up what this work is asking
the viewer to think about. The work the painters do is distinguished by
the Chinese oil painting community as either “commercial”—work that is a
direct copy of a photograph or masters’ painting and used for
decorative purposes—or “creative” work that is an original fine art
composition. The painters I photographed for the Wushipu series are
making “commercial” paintings, which comprise 80% of the multi-billion
dollar oil painting industry.
In my opinion, this labor is
definitely not fine art, but while one painter told me he hated painting
and just did it for money, many of the painters aspire to a more high-profile
career in which they are respected as fine artists. They see their
commercial work as a way to build their skills and pay the rent.
It’s
difficult for artists in China to gain recognition as fine artists if
they haven’t gone to one of the top universities. Some painters who did
not go to university complained that it is elitist because those
universities require that you speak English to get in. I’m guessing that
the English requirement is there because texts about contemporary art
and theory are generally not written in or translated into Chinese.
Because the commercial painters don’t have the access to such texts, it
is difficult for them to work or think within the contemporary art
context or to understand how value is assigned to art work. I believe
many of these painters could do more interesting work under different
circumstances and with a better art education, but they are trained to
copy masters rather than to experiment or think of an idea of their own.
Many think a painting is good if it looks exactly like what they’re
copying. In spending time with this community, I have met some highly
skilled painters who are incredibly inventive people living the life of
an artist, but making carbon copy paintings so they can feed their
families.
What entertains me about this industry is that many of
these paintings are sold in galleries in the U.S. and Europe with a
fake name signed to them. For instance, a gallery in Venice may want
tourists to believe they are buying a painting of the Venice canals by a
Venetian artist so they sign an Italian name to the painting. No one
would buy it if they knew it was painted in China.
To see more work by Priscilla, please visit priscillabriggs.com.
Featured Artist Interviews are conducted by Chicago-based interdisciplinary artist Stacia Yeapanis. When she’s not writing for OPP, Stacia explores the emotional and spiritual significance of repetition in her cross-stitch embroideries, remix video and collage installations. She is an instructor in the Department of Fiber and Material Studies at The School of the Art Institute of Chicago, where received her MFA in 2006, and was a 2012-2013 Mentor-in-Residence at BOLT in Chicago. Her work is on view through September 2013 in Abstracting the Seam (Hyde Park Art Center, Chicago), and she has two upcoming solo exhibitions: I Still Haven’t Found What I’m Looking For (Klemm Gallery, Adrian, Michigan) in November 2013 and Right Here, Right Now (Heaven Gallery, Chicago) in January 2014.